History of Anti-Gay Marriage


The topic of gay marriage has only recently become a widely-debated issue. Gay couples began to demand equal civil rights, including the right to the legal protections of marriage, in the early 1970s. But public comment against gay marriage didn’t begin until material moves toward legalizing the act were made. As a consequence, anti-gay marriage arguments have been mostly reactionary, with groups protesting any step made toward legalizing gay marriage.

The first legally recognized same-sex partnership was in Denmark in 1989, but the first legal gay marriage wasn’t until 2001, in the Netherlands. Since then, countries and states within countries have reacted to gay marriages conducted in other countries by passing laws that prevent foreign gay marriages from being recognized.

It was only recently that homosexuality has been decriminalized in many countries. Romania repealed its last anti-gay law in 2001 and many African countries as well as some countries in Asia still have laws against homosexuality . In the US, San Francisco marriages conducted in 2004 during a brief period of rebellion against state law were later declared void by the state of California. Washington state banned gay marriage in the Defence of Marriage Act 1998, and reinforced the act in 2001.

Publicity surrounding the issue has forced churches to take a public stand on gay marriage. Normally a tolerant church, the Anglican Church held a convention to discuss gay marriage and tolerance toward homosexuality. The church ruled that gay marriages were against its teachings and distanced itself from church members who support gay rights.

By lifetips

Comments
2 Responses to “History of Anti-Gay Marriage”
  1. “Normally a tolerant church, the Anglican Church held a convention to discuss gay marriage and tolerance toward homosexuality. The church ruled that gay marriages were against its teachings and distanced itself from church members who support gay rights.”

    But a Church should not see tolerance (of this specific type) as an end in itself. On the contrary, given that they believe in the existence of God, that he should be obeyed, etc., the only right way to decide policy is to attempt to interpret God’s will.

    Now, I am the first to agree that God almost certainly does not exist and that the Churches should be criticized for silly believes, but that is another issue.

    • gaydayzine says:

      Thanks Micheal! To add to your comment I would say that God doesn’t make mistakes and if there is any thing wrong with this world then it’s related to churches whom interpret, manipulate and mislead everything in serving their narrow minds!

What do you think?..

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: